The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the rate of total birth defects among the 20 000 women consuming less than 10 000 iu was only 1.5 percent by contrast chris points out the generally accepted background rate is three to four percent the rate of defects among the three thousand women consuming more than ten thousand iu of vitamin a was three percent the lower end of normal which we usually observe for birth defects in the general population
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.