The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we're talking about a form of vitamin A and it acts like a hormone in fact that it works in the intracellular in the DNA level so it's affecting transcription of particular genes it's promoting collagen synthesis it's increasing the turnover of skin cells it's one of the few things that's proven for anti-aging but also for acne
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it works in the intracellular in the DNA level so it's affecting transcription of particular genes it's promoting collagen synthesis it's increasing the turnover of skin cells it's one of the few things that's proven for anti-aging but also for acne so there are a wide range of forms of vitamin A but it's one of the top three things I would recommend for everyone to be using if they are interested in having a skin care regimen that's effective