The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I would not be surprised at all if part of what we are seeing here with omnivores being deficient in b12 is a negative response from plant toxins we know that tannins and hibbett digestion we know that fiber can bind hormones I am super curious about this it is my hypothesis that b12 deficiency and omnivores is probably related to Plan anti-nutrients
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
omnivore deficiency in b12 which I believe is related to plants