The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
animal products and organs that's the answer you wanted isn't it well you can say whatever you want Tommy you know that um I think uh when have you coddled when have you given me the answer that I want almost never um so Seafood meat and organs uh essentially I mean I think that's important to point out that when I look and correct me if you see this differently when I look there's no place to get vitamin B12 other than animal Foods end of story full stop
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.