Paul Saladino· MD
and so basically there is like it still the fraction that's still 20 liters 20 liters right there is that you are not the Wilkes assertion that you can get enough vitamin b12 from drinking lake water is basically unfounded
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and so basically there is like it still the fraction that's still 20 liters 20 liters right there is that you are not the Wilkes assertion that you can get enough vitamin b12 from drinking lake water is basically unfounded
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you would have to drink between 3 and 20 liters of this water when there are the most Gloria or Santa Clara there's another maybe it is nuclear eeeh there's a there's a sort of a protozoa that lives in the water that can give you some beat well if you're drinking Euglena sorry Euglena gracilis in the English Lake District and and if you look at the amount of Euglena in this water at different times of the year it's only one it's the highest you could ever get anything approaching a biologically relevant amount of b12 and the rest of the year you would have to drink 20 to 40 litres this water and there's only at one Lake in England