The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, in this case, you could see like B vitamins, his B5 was super low. And then vitamin C is almost always low. I mean, he wasn't flatlined, but but he was on the low end. And my thought is vitamin C being an antioxidant, the body's just going to burn up as much as it can to try to protect you from the free radical damage of the mycotoxins.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.