The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the instance of vitamin C it's like how do we measure that how do we really know what's optimal and I think that any discussions of optimal have to have a metric right and in the case of vitamin C we talked about do you measure in hydroxy to deoxy guanosine do you measure with peroxides do you have to do something really esoteric like measure oxidize to reduce glutathione how do you know what optimal is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one of the things that I asked Chris in that podcast I hope I asked Chris was what markers would you check and let's check them and let's see and some of those markers are hard to do like oxidize to reduce glutathione