The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the form of ox ascorbic acid that you're taking in a supplement is probably not the way it's gonna be packaged in a food you know what a food molecule and I argue that it's probably excess vitamin C at least in the red blood cell with this mechanism of g6pd looks like it could be a pro-oxidant which is not what we want
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.