The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and in that situation I mean some people will point to the efficacy of vitamin C in sepsis and I think well they're using IV vitamin C and it's probably acting as a pro-oxidant rather than an antioxidant in that situation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
People diagnosed with sepsis typically have low vitamin C levels which might be predictive of increased risk for organ failure