Rhonda Patrick· PhD
it is important to note that successive treatments with high-dose intravenous vitamin C has not been shown to increase Pro oxidative markers and healthy
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is important to note that successive treatments with high-dose intravenous vitamin C has not been shown to increase Pro oxidative markers and healthy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
pharmacologic doses of intravenous vitamin see greater than 1 gram generates hydrogen peroxide a type of reactive oxygen species that can damage DNA RNA and proteins leading to tissue damage
successive treatments with high-dose intravenous vitamin C has not been shown to increase Pro oxidative markers and healthy individuals suggesting that while the high-dose intravenous vitamin C may produce hydrogen peroxide and this hydrogen peroxide may be killing other pathogens such as viruses or other you know unhealthy cells such as cancer cells normal cells are not damaged by the burst of hydrogen peroxide produced by the high dose of intravenous vitamin C