Paul Saladino· MD
there is essentially zero concern of scurvy on a well-formulated nose-to-tail carnivore diet
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is essentially zero concern of scurvy on a well-formulated nose-to-tail carnivore diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
three or four months ago I hadn't measured it was 0.8 milligrams per deciliter which is a 50 micromolar per liter that we talked about and again I was eating a lot of salmon roe I was eating nose-to-tail not salmon roe and I wasn't supplementing vitamin C and so maybe you know that's a reasonable cutoff
with vitamin C I think that there is good evidence that doses beyond 70 50 70 milligrams are not beneficial for humans and we can easily obtain 50 to 70 milligrams of vitamin C eating animal foods nose-to-tail