Paul Saladino· MD
I think the data support aiming for at least 90 milligrams a day and 100 to 150 milligrams a day for maximal suppression of chronic disease risk
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I think the data support aiming for at least 90 milligrams a day and 100 to 150 milligrams a day for maximal suppression of chronic disease risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
supplementation studies suggest that when we hundred to 150 milligrams we are maximizing our plasma concentrations of vitamin C we're maximizing our white blood cell levels of vitamin C in ways that support better immune function and though the blood levels that you get up there are around the ones that are associated with lower risks of CVD cardiovascular disease and certain cancers and observational studies
the data support aiming for at least 90 milligrams a day and 100 to 150 milligrams a day for maximal suppression of chronic disease risk
getting 150 milligrams of vitamin C puts us at the top of what anyone could really advocate with any considerable quality evidence we'd provide any benefit and well under what anyone would argue would have any kind of toxicity