The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When you measure your glucose when you're getting vitamin C you get a false positive on the meter falsely high you get falsely high well at least the abbott precision extra yeah it is you know when you measure that meter that a say on the meter is also sensitive to the pH of your blood too and there's a redox shift and but ascorbic acid is a powerful reducing agent and that might be altering the the assay
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.