The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can't do it orally not so much because of the excretion you'll excrete it both in the whether it's intravenous or oral it's just that the gastric acid does not permit the absorption of vitamin C beyond a certain level in the in the gut
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
bioavailability intravenous vitamin C bypasses intestinal absorption and the saturated Obul transport mechanisms so consequently the bioavailability of vitamin C differs appreciably between oral and intravenous administration
Oral and intravenous supplementation of vitamin C both potentially merit worthy in different context are in some ways worlds apart in biological activity because of the sheer concentrated increase in plasma levels that happens when you take something intravenously
intravenous vitamin C bypasses intestinal absorption which means that it also bypasses the saturable transport mechanisms that means that the bioavailability of intravenous vitamin C is a lot higher than oral vitamin C