Peter Attia· MD
Other formulations of vitamin C will use um, you know, an oil-based formula. It's not aquous because then the vitamin C is much less likely to be reduced in that kind of formulation.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Other formulations of vitamin C will use um, you know, an oil-based formula. It's not aquous because then the vitamin C is much less likely to be reduced in that kind of formulation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Other formulations of vitamin C will use um, you know, an oil-based formula. It's not aquous because then the vitamin C is much less likely to be reduced in that kind of formulation. But those products tend to be petroleum oilbased and also have all sorts of negatives associated with it. And then there are some products that will microenccapsulate or find other creative ways of making sure that the vitamin C is actually bioavailable when it hits your skin.
So I that product may have not worked for you but there are other options to find a stable vitamin C and and this is one of those products where you know again we have our own you know custom formulas