The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the fruit and vegetable intake was increased in someone's diet and their vitamin C intake went from 7702 270 milligrams a day and despite increased blood levels of vitamin C there was no change in antioxidant parameters DNA damage etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the intake of vitamin C increased from 70 milligrams a day to 250 milligrams a day in the intervention group with no change in antioxidant capacity or DNA damage
there's a study that i will talk about later in this podcast showing that when the amount of vitamin c in a diet was increased from 7-0 70 milligrams to 270 milligrams an interventional group that included more fruits and vegetables in their diet the serum levels of vitamin c went up 30 percent but there was absolutely no change in their markers of inflammation oxidative stress or dna damage