The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a meta-analysis of six trials involving more than 600 marathon runners, skiers and soldiers reported 50% fewer colds suggesting that people who frequently participate in high endurance exercise might be more responsive to supplemental vitamin C than others
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
six trials involving more than 600 marathon runners, skiers and soldiers reported 50% fewer colds among those who took supplemental vitamin C
For example, 6 trials involving more than 600 marathon runners, skiers and soldiers reported 50% fewer cold when supplementing with vitamin C.