The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's important to note that the people who had the highest baseline vitamin C levels also had lower risk factors for developing respiratory diseases they were generally younger and healthier were less likely to smoke consumed less alcohol were physically more active and had lower prevalence of other chronic illnesses than those with lower vitamin C levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.