The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
between 1944 and February 1946 and they had 20 volunteers who took part in the experiment they were put on the diet that excluded all vitamin C containing foods for six weeks but included a vitamin supplement vitamin C supplement of 70 milligrams of ascorbic acid then three of them were continued on the 70 milligrams of ascorbic acid 7 on a supplement of 10 milligrams and 10 were given zero vitamin C
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.