The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Italy I used I didn't know Italy was profoundly deficient look at that when the worst D deficiency rates in Europe and they're all scratching their heads wondering why it leaves bad women sixty to eighty Lord and five nanogram in twenty seven percent of the women this is 60 to 80 in the community five five and lower than twelve and as many as seventy six percent of the women these are basement levels right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
ivor did some great work looking at the average levels of 25 hydroxy vitamin d which is one of the forms of vitamin d in the body and comparing it with italian women to japanese individuals and the rates were just off the charts so like there was a large amount of the population in japan that had over 30 nanograms per ml and a very like 12 percent in in italy had that level of vitamin d