The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't know if South Asians are adapted to have vitamin D levels of 60 or 80 plus it makes sense to get them between 30 to 40 anecdotally what I have seen and this is completely anecdotally is in some of those patients I definitely see that see reactive proteins do improve because vitamin D does have some anti-inflammatory effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.