The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So based on that study, we don't have 60,000 units typically here in the hospital, we have 50,000. So I figured the 50 versus 60 is going to be very small difference. And so that's currently what I'm doing in my patients and I'm recommending to my colleagues to do the same. We haven't seen any toxicity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.