Paul Saladino· MD
I didn't really like to see vitamin D above 45 I've when I was in Seattle and getting sunlight every day for like an hour I had a vitamin D about 5055 interesting
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I didn't really like to see vitamin D above 45 I've when I was in Seattle and getting sunlight every day for like an hour I had a vitamin D about 5055 interesting
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and now my vitamin D is 44
I do not take vitamin D I want all of the vitamin D in my blood to reflect sun exposure and I think that store studies would suggest that vitamin D at least in terms of beneficial outcomes is probably a proxy for sun exposure supplementation with vitamin D doesn't seem to have anywhere near the benefits that getting it from the Sun might
my vitamin D is around 75. if you want to know all of my blood work