We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
out of all the things i mentioned that has the weakest evidence that was sort of a retrospective review of hospitalized patients just looking at their levels and they found some correlation but it doesn't imply causation necessarily all the other stuff has randomized controlled trial data behind it the vitamin d thing was a retrospective review
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.