The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
among ICU subjects so among patients in the ICU eighty four point six in this study it was a small study eighty four point six had a vitamin D insufficiency versus four on the floor so eighty four point six in the ICU had vitamin D deficiency versus 57% of those on the floor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
suppressed immune function was prevalent 92.3% had low lymphocytes which is a type of white blood cell and nine were profoundly lymphocyte apena which means very low lymphocytes in the ICU of the people with vitamin D insufficiency