The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
vitamin D deficiency you know first off there's not even a really clear definition of what that is um I believe medically it's defined as a vitamin D level less than 15 although some Labs would consider a deficiency if you're less than 30
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and 60 and being inadequate is considered at levels below 30 nanograms per milliliter
deficiency is Vitamin uh 25 hydroxy vitamin D levels less than 20 nanograms per Mill sufficiency is about 30 getting you know so if you're insufficient you're less than 30 but if you're sufficient you're more than 30