The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you know if if you're running a car and your Pistons are are firing um out of sync with each other I mean that's kind of what's happening when you when you don't have adequate levels of vitamin D your genes aren't being regulated in the way they're supposed to be so things aren't being activated when they're supposed to be or repressed when they're supposed to be so things are kind of you know going going arai
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.