The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in order for pregnant nursing mothers to put vitamin d into their breast milk for their children their serum level of vitamin d needs to be around 10 nanograms per ml in order to get to the serum level of 10 you have to have a plasma level of vitamin d at 48 nanograms per ml
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
how many postpartum nursing mothers have a vitamin d of 48 i'd say very few which is why most babies need vitamin d supplementation or they need to go in the sun because most moms don't have enough vitamin d in their breast milk or in their bodies because they're not getting enough
found literature suggesting that if mother's vitamin d level we're not 48 nanograms per ml there's not enough vitamin d in her breast milk for the baby