The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what's the problem with being deficient in vitamin d well again people might recall a disease called rickets and you see this often in developing parts of the world where people are really malnourished and they have really really soft sort of spongy bones
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Well, again, people might recall a disease called ricketetts. And you see this often in developing parts of the world where people are really malnourished and they have really really soft sort of spongy bones.