The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And it showed basically, when they supplemented patients in the hospital with 60,000 units a day for 7 days, that there was an improvement by day 21 in the number of COVID-negative patients on testing. [...] The other thing that they looked at was fibrinogen, which was a marker of inflammation that was significantly lower as well.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.