The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Seeing the study about penis size and vitamin K2 made me think what foods have the most vitamin K2 so if you look at it pork ribs and dark meat chicken have a lot of vitamin K2 Nat natto Nat does but it's not MK4 so MK4 is in pork and chicken and so I thought okay maybe I need to start eating more dark meat chicken Nat is mk7 and we don't actually know if that's that valuable for humans right and cheeses is MK9 mk10 MK1 so again we don't know if that's as valuable for humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it was a study done with 100 micrograms of vitamin K2 in the MK4 form as a supplement and 50,000 IUS of vitamin D3 which is a huge amount of vitamin D so who knows if you can actually increase penis size