Paul Saladino· MD
you can see here this is phytonadione which is the essentially the phylloquinone this is phytonadione which is the essentially the phylloquinone this is vitamin k1 infants are not given vitamin k2 which is ironic i suppose
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can see here this is phytonadione which is the essentially the phylloquinone this is phytonadione which is the essentially the phylloquinone this is vitamin k1 infants are not given vitamin k2 which is ironic i suppose
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i want to show you guys a picture of the vitamin k that is given to infants you can see this is uh phytonadium phytonution yeah you can see here this is phytonadione which is the essentially the phylloquinone this is vitamin k1 infants are not given vitamin k2
infants are given traditionally in the hospital a vitamin k1 shot to help with clotting more parents are refusing that i think because they are concerned about babies getting shots in the hospital at birth which is their choice but this is leading to more hemorrhagic disease of the newborn because many mothers i believe in our society are not eating enough vitamin k2 in their diet