The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's we can always talk about direct calry but that's so let's say call it intrusive into a process and so little um it's practical to do so indirect calry measured with V2 Max or V2 and V2 Max is is a superior method to understand how much energy are you able to release in this process
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so indirect calry measured with V2 Max or V2 and V2 Max is is a superior method to understand how much energy are you able to release in this process