The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you go from low to below average to above average too high to elite you can see what is the hazard ratio so it's interesting going from just being low to being below average is a 50 reduction in mortality over a decade if you're starting in your 50s
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you then go from low to above average it's about a 60 or 70 reduction in mortality
the greatest longevity benefit that comes from improving your V2 Max is from people starting from a below average V2 Max and moving anywhere above average so even going from a below normal V2 Max for your age group and gender to a low normal is associated with a 2.1y year increase in life expectancy bumping that up going from a below below normal to high normal V 2 max is associated with a 2.9 year increase in life expectancy and going even further to the upper limit of normal is associated with 4.9 years so almost 5year increase in life expectancy on average