The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
that I mean that puts a lot of emphasis that it sort of points to the idea of really taking care to avoid to the to the extent possible obviously to avoid these sort of events because you can actually in the absence of those events the decline doesn't have to be that steep you can you can hang on probably better than people used to think
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that puts a lot of emphasis that it sort of points to the idea of really taking care to avoid to the to the extent possible obviously to avoid these sorts of events because you can actually in the absence of those those events the decline doesn't have to be that steep
the decline is not that steep uh for any individual but what happens is you have certain events in your life you you have you get an injury and you're stopped training for six months and then you're hosed yeah so either you have reduced activity for six months or you have bed rest for a week which can be disastrous
And of course, if you have an injury and you stop training, it's going to accelerate more.