The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and you know one thing we should we should say is there are reports of people in their 90s but reports vo2 max high vo2 max numbers are they they sprout very easily uh because it's hard to do these tests right and in fact a lot of the tests that people the garden variety machinery used to do these tests is not designed to handle seven liters of oxygen per minute and so uh you get spurious results
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.