The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the first thing they did the next day is they disassembled the machine the the metabolic cart and send it back to the manufacturer to get it calibrated to find out if they you know are we nuts is this real is this true and it came back that yeah it's working and all the numbers all of the other people yeah exactly all the other tests that were done in that day were all within line yeah so you know so they figured this is real
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the first thing they did the next day is they disassembled the machine the the metabolic cart and send it back to the manufacturer to get it calibrated to find out if they you know are we nuts is this real is this true and it came back that yeah it's working and all the numbers all of the other people yeah exactly all the other tests that were done in that day were all within line yeah so you know so they figured this is real