The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so when we're talking about high numbers and there's you know matt carpenter 92 kelly and jorney every there's a lot of people who have high numbers virtually none of them are published in the scientific literature the highest values you know you go back to the 70s where uh some some of the great runners were tested and you get you know steve prefontaine was 84 and there aren't a lot of published values above the high 80s
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.