The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
this study that we're talking about put people into the bottom 25th percentile you know 25th to 50th percentile 50th to 75th and then the last group it basically divided into you know 75th to 97 and A5 and then they had that little sliver of people that they called Elite that were at the top two and a half percentile and all cause mortality just went lower and lower and lower and lower correct
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
another study published in Jama in 2018 found that there was no apparent upper limit to the benefit of cardiorespiratory Fitness on mortality within normal ranges of human life expectancy of course um in fact the study reported that Elite performers these are people that performed in the top 2.3% on the fitness test had an 80% reduction in mortality risk compared to the lowest performers so they performed in the bottom 25% on the fitness test
if you compare the elite performers to the high performers so these folks did really well but they were just under the elite they were they were between the top 25% and the top 2.3% the elite performers had a 20% mortality risk decline compared to even those High performers