The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yeah I think we want to look at output measures V2 Max is the best output measure we can look at something like heart rate and Zone 2 we can look R recovery heart rate recovery we can look at actual output measures because at the end of the day I fundamentally think that's what matters
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we don't have the metabolic capacity to move we decline a lot faster and so again V2 Max and heart rate at different speeds that correlates the ability to move and maintain that as we age that's far more predictive I think than just an internal metric that you know is important but is does not have the same predictive power