The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we know that for example if you do a view to Max effort and then basically you give an adequate time of rest in between there you are able to go even harder on the next one now even though that was completely to exhaustion on the first one
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so if the if if if the duration of the rest in between there then you you are not able to draw the effect of that anymore that can be I think you could probably extend it up to 15 or maybe 20 minutes but when you get past 20 minutes then I would be a little bit I'm not so sure whether that would hold true anymore
we have done multiple times over the last half decade is is that very often people think that okay when I done A View to Max effort then basically I'm Dum I won't be able to repeat that I need two days of rest or maybe a week of rest or whatever before I can do that that's not true either we know that for example if you do a view to Max effort and then basically you give an adequate time of rest in between there you are able to go even harder on the next one
if the if if the duration or the rest in between that then you you are not able to draw the effect of that anymore that can be I think you could probably extend it up to 15 or maybe 20 minutes but when you get past 20 minutes then I would be a little bit I'm not so sure whether that would hold true anymore so it needs to be short