The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was just a paper published a big review uh in the last month or two arguing that you know in some cases the lungs aren't overbuilt and one of the situations is highly trained endurance athletes they can be limited by their ability to uh to get enough oxygen in
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there was just a paper published a big review in the last month or two arguing that you know in some cases the lungs aren't overbuilt and one of the situations is highly trained endurance athletes they can be limited by their ability to get enough oxygen in