Peter Attia· MD
the good thing with VI to max testing is that they're the generally um accepted standard for doing this is a graded exercise test and and you go through that and it will produce fairly um comparable numbers
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the good thing with VI to max testing is that they're the generally um accepted standard for doing this is a graded exercise test and and you go through that and it will produce fairly um comparable numbers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the good thing with v to max testing is that there the generally um accepted standard for doing this is a grader exercise test and and you go through that and it will produce fairly um comparable numbers um for most people to relate to