Peter Attia· MD
if that represented two-thirds of his volume um yes he'd have a lower vo2 max but he might have been a better cyclist
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if that represented two-thirds of his volume um yes he'd have a lower vo2 max but he might have been a better cyclist
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but then what we have to understand as well that this is not necessarily what you need in in t the France you don't need to be the best four minute 4minute athlete this is more important for a track cyclist a track cyclist that has the working time for four hour for 4 minutes then VI 2 max becomes maybe the best predictor of per performance again so it's a little bit depending on context