The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's not like I'm going to train for a marathon after I train for the marathon I'm GNA go back to doing what I was doing it's you really do want to create a program that you can keep up with for years and decades and also you keep that timeline perspective of okay I don't need to increase at a insane amount because what I want to do is not get injured be able to do something that I can do find enjoyment out of it and find Value
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so you know the name of the game is play the game and stay in the game forever and so we are really looking to minimize injury here and we're looking to minimize burnout and the first few times a person even experiments and dabbles with these 4minute intervals I actually want them to come away thinking that wasn't too bad great try a little bit harder the next time but we're we're not here to to sort of wipe you out — after the first session or even the first couple of rounds