The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so yeah so normally what I do is like starting with the metabolic test I translate that information into whether is Watts uh or or speed or heart rate uh all of them normally they correlate quite well um and you can individualize it there are people that don't have a power meter okay you can do heart rate for example um or or people that just obviously they run or they walk uh you can do speed or or or heart rate as well right they're very good surrogate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.