The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the treatment that we give children for this is zinc so it's something that it doesn't require gene therapy it doesn't need anything that fancy we can simply use zinc to out compete copper and make sure that we don't end up with an copper overload situation and we have treatments that are very well tolerated Pennies A Day In terms of doing this we hope extremely effective long term
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
although gene therapy is wonderful I want to underscore we don't always need gene therapy as long as we have that early diagnosis