The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but you said if you cross to the point where you cannot maintain that conversation that's where you you is because yeah you're you're you're you're you need to breathe much faster because you're producing more CO2 and that's probably because you're already transitioning from the slow twitch
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you cross to the point where you cannot maintain that conversation that's where you you is because yeah you're you're you're you're you need to breathe much faster because you're producing more CO2 and that's probably because you're already transitioning from the slow twitch mle fibers to the fast twitch mcle fibers more glycolytic more lactate more CO2 more buffering capacity
you're you're need to breathe much faster because you're producing more co2 and that's probably because you're already transitioning from the slow twitch muscle fibers to the fast switch muscle fibers more glycolytic more lactate more co2 more buffering capacity