Peter Attia· MD
that's a very good point that's why an hour and a half on the bike it might actually be one hour or so right because you have all these artifacts but you're right when you're on the trainer you isolate everything completely
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
that's a very good point that's why an hour and a half on the bike it might actually be one hour or so right because you have all these artifacts but you're right when you're on the trainer you isolate everything completely
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that's why an hour and a half on the bike it might actually be one hour or so right because you have all these artifacts but you're right when you're on the trainer you isolate everything completely
because we we tell patients you know again it depends where they are in their cycle but if they're starting out I mean we''ll be happy if they give us 30 minutes to four times a we ofed exercise
that's why an hour and a half on the bike it might actually be one hour or so right because you have all these artifacts but you're right when you're on the trainer you isolate everything completely