The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think training frequency matters which is where you get Zone to right you can't do V2 Max training five six days a week we do a lot more Zone 2 we do a lot more frequency and volume of that and I think that translates uh more than likely into a higher V or into a higher HRV even if you didn't go out and do a bunch of the zone or the you know V2 max type work
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we do a lot more zone two we do a lot more frequency and volume of that and I think that translates uh more than likely into a higher V or into a higher HRV even if you didn't go out and do a bunch of the zone or the you know V2 max type work